What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Admin User -
Number of replies: 14
 

As a first step, we invite you to briefly introduce yourself by sharing your role, organization, or territorial context, and telling us how you came across this course and what motivated you to participate.

Next, please develop your response to the forum questions, reflecting on your experience and identifying the main challenges in designing, prioritizing, or implementing Nature‑based Solutions for flood risk mitigation.

Finally, we encourage you to include any institutional or policy recommendations that you believe are necessary to facilitate the adoption and implementation of these solutions in your context.

In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Carlos Daza -
Hola
1. Soy ingeniero ambiental y actualmente trabajo como profesional independiente. Encontré este curso por recomendación de un compañero de la universidad y estoy emocionado de estar aquí. Mi
 principal motivación para unirme es aprender conceptos clave y acciones prácticas para mitigar escenarios de inundaciones, así como adquirir habilidades en modelado e implementación del riesgo de inundaciones. Espero aplicar lo aprendido en mis proyectos futuros e intercambiar experiencias con todos.
2. En las primeras etapas de la inversión, considero esenciales cuatro tipos de información. En primer lugar, datos de riesgo: registros históricos de inundaciones, series de precipitaciones, y topografía de alta resolución. En segundo lugar, evidencia de exposición y vulnerabilidad, como mapas de población, infraestructura y pérdidas pasadas. En tercer lugar, herramientas de modelado como HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS y SIG, incluidas proyecciones del cambio climático, para simular escenarios de inundaciones. En cuarto lugar, el análisis económico, en particular las comparaciones coste-beneficio de soluciones estructurales y basadas en la naturaleza. Por último, no deben pasarse por alto los conocimientos locales y la capacidad institucional, ya que determinan si las medidas elegidas pueden realmente implementarse y mantenerse.
In reply to Carlos Daza

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Admin User -
Hola Carlos, muchas gracias por presentarte y por compartir tu experiencia y expectativas frente al curso. Es muy valioso que menciones la importancia de los datos históricos, la modelación y el análisis costo-beneficio. Precisamente uno de los objetivos de WaterProof es ayudar a traducir este tipo de información técnica en indicadores más accesibles para apoyar procesos de priorización e inversión en Soluciones basadas en la Naturaleza.

Te invitamos a prestar especial atención a los siguientes módulos relacionados con la modelación de inundaciones, el cálculo de daños evitados y la evaluación económica, ya que allí podrás ver cómo WaterProof integra estos conceptos para comparar escenarios con y sin implementación de NbS.

Esperamos que el curso te brinde herramientas útiles para tus futuros proyectos y que también podamos aprender de tu experiencia a lo largo de las discusiones y ejercicios prácticos.

¡Bienvenido al curso y muchas gracias por tu aporte!
----------------------------------

Hello Carlos, thank you very much for introducing yourself and sharing your experience and expectations regarding the course. It is very valuable that you highlight the importance of historical data, modeling, and cost-benefit analysis. Indeed, one of WaterProof’s objectives is to help translate this type of technical information into more accessible indicators to support prioritization and investment processes for Nature-based Solutions (NbS).

We encourage you to pay special attention to the upcoming modules on flood modeling, the calculation of avoided damages, and economic assessment; there, you will see how WaterProof integrates these concepts to compare scenarios with and without the implementation of NbS.

We hope the course provides you with useful tools for your future projects and that we can also learn from your experience during the discussions and practical exercises.

Welcome to the course, and thank you for your contribution!
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Nactaly Posada -
I work in hydrology, water resources assessment in Colombia. My interest in this course comes from the need to integrate Nature-based Solutions into flood risk management and territorial planning.

In early investment stages, I consider essential the use of hydrological and climate data, flood hazard maps, land cover, topography, historical events, and future climate scenarios. GIS, hydrological modelling, remote sensing, and multicriteria analysis are useful tools to identify priority areas and compare alternatives.

A main challenge is the limited availability of local data to evaluate the effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions. It is also necessary to consider technical performance together with land availability, costs, maintenance, social acceptance, and environmental benefits.
In reply to Nactaly Posada

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Admin User -
Hi Nectaly, Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your observation about the limited availability of local data is especially relevant, as it is one of the main challenges faced when evaluating flood risk and Nature-based Solutions in many regions of the world.

One of the objectives of WaterProof is precisely to support preliminary assessments in data-scarce environments by leveraging globally available datasets. For example, the platform integrates Copernicus DEM for terrain representation, ERA5-Land for climate and extreme rainfall analysis, SoilGrids for soil properties and infiltration estimates, ESA WorldCover for land-cover characterization, GHSL (Global Human Settlement Layer) for exposure assessment, and NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 projections for future climate scenarios. Together, these datasets provide a consistent basis for modeling flood risk and evaluating Nature-based Solutions at the watershed scale.

At the same time, your point about considering social acceptance, land availability, implementation costs, and institutional capacity is extremely important. While WaterProof provides a robust analytical framework, the platform is intended to complement—not replace—local knowledge and stakeholder engagement. Combining global datasets with local expertise is often the most effective way to support decision-making and identify realistic opportunities for implementation.

As you continue through the course, we encourage you to pay particular attention to the modules on flood modeling, scenario analysis, and economic valuation, where you will see how these global datasets are integrated to estimate flood impacts, avoided damages, and the benefits of Nature-based Solutions.

Thank you again for your contribution. We look forward to your participation throughout the training.

The WaterProof Team
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Lateefat Balogun -
I am Lateefat, a graduate in Forestry and Wildlife Management and a research intern at the Federal College of Forestry, Ibadan, Nigeria. I work in Ibadan/Ilorin, where flooding is a recurring problem, especially in fast-growing urban areas with poor drainage and loss of vegetation cover. I found this course while searching for more knowledge on how NBS can help in flood mitigation and I joined because I want to learn how forest and vegetation-based approaches can be used for flood risk reduction.

The main challenges I usually face are limited and poorly maintained hydrological and flood data, weak coordination between agencies, difficulty proving the benefits of nature-based solutions in monetary terms, competing land uses and limited long-term funding for maintenances.
I will be glad if local communities and traditional authorities are involved in design, protection and monitoring.

I look forward to learning from everyone's experiences.
In reply to Lateefat Balogun

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Admin User -
Hi Lateefat,

Thank you for sharing your experience and perspective. The challenges you describe are very common in many regions, particularly the difficulty of demonstrating the benefits of Nature-based Solutions in terms that resonate with planners, decision-makers, and potential investors. One of the objectives of WaterProof is precisely to help address that challenge. Beyond identifying priority areas where Nature-based Solutions can be implemented, the platform also estimates flood-risk reduction benefits and translates them into economic indicators such as avoided damages, Expected Annual Damage (EAD), Net Present Value (NPV), and Return on Investment (ROI). These metrics can help support conversations with funders and decision-makers by providing quantitative evidence of the value generated by NbS interventions.

We also agree with your observation regarding local communities and traditional authorities. Technical analyses are most effective when combined with local knowledge, stakeholder engagement, and long-term stewardship. In many cases, successful implementation depends not only on identifying where interventions should occur, but also on ensuring that local stakeholders are actively involved in planning, implementation, and monitoring processes.

We hope the upcoming modules help you explore how flood modeling, economic valuation, and Nature-based Solutions can be integrated to support more informed and actionable decisions.

Thank you for contributing to the discussion, and we look forward to learning from your experiences throughout the course.

The WaterProof Team
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Amy Crouch -
Hello! I'm Amy, the Little Sioux Watershed Project Director for The Nature Conservancy and facilitator of the Little Sioux Watershed Conservation Partnership (LSWCP). I'm located in the state of Iowa, USA. One of the internal TNC networks shared the webinar invitation via email.
We're currently working with local city and county governments, along with several federal and state agencies to design a watershed-wide plan focused on flood reduction, community resilience, and increased recreational opportunities using NbS. That made learning about this tool a perfect fit.
 
I consider hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, local knowledge, and stakeholder - not just government, but also community members - buy-in as critical to decision making in early implementation stages. Knowing how to translate the science into concepts locals care about goes so far when introducing NbS to those not familiar with it. Another item is showing multiple benefits to these practices: Increasing healthy outdoor recreational opportunities for community members that may even bring in tourism dollars can really increase the level of engagement and enthusiasm.
In reply to Amy Crouch

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Admin User -
Hi Amy, It’s great to have you here and learn more about the work you’re doing. Hopefully, we’ll have the opportunity to collaborate in the future! Your point about stakeholder engagement is especially important. While hydrological modeling, flood-risk maps, and economic analyses provide valuable evidence, successful implementation often depends on how effectively that information is communicated to local communities, landowners, and decision-makers.

We strongly agree that translating technical information into concepts that people can relate to is a critical step in building support for Nature-based Solutions. In many cases, highlighting the multiple benefits of these interventions—such as flood-risk reduction, improved water quality, recreation opportunities, habitat enhancement, and even local economic benefits—can help strengthen participation and long-term commitment.

This is also one of the goals of WaterProof. Beyond identifying where interventions may generate the greatest benefits, the platform helps translate complex hydrological processes into maps, indicators, avoided damages, and economic metrics that can support conversations with communities, planners, funders, and local authorities.

Your comment also reminds us that there is always room to improve communication, outreach, and capacity-building efforts. The ability to connect science with local knowledge and community priorities is often just as important as the technical analysis itself.

Thank you for contributing to the discussion.

The WaterProof Team
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Abdul-roqeeb Solotan -
Hello everyone! I am Abdul-roqeeb Solotan, a recent graduate in Lagos, Nigeria. I came across this course on LinkedIn; I am participating in this course so I can learn how best to address the severe coastal erosion and urban flooding facing our megacity.

The primary challenges in implementing Nature-based Solutions (NbS) locally stem from intense land competition where coastal mangrove buffers have been sand-filled, political bias toward quick concrete projects, and a lack of long-term operational funding. De-risking these projects for early-stage investors requires high-resolution hydrological data, clear avoided-damage cost models, and spatial screening to ensure sites are protected from urban encroachment.

To drive adoption in Lagos and in Nigeria in general, local policy must mandate green-gray assessments in public procurement, strictly enforce coastal wetland zoning, and establish dedicated municipal funds for long-term ecosystem maintenance.
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Haimanti Pakrashi -
Hello I am Haimanti. I am currently based in Ohio, USA. I am an environmental project manager from India. Looking for oppurtunities to work in the Nature sector here.
I have worked and studied Sunderbans, the largest mangrove forested islands located in the Indo Gangetic delta shared between Bangladesh and India. These islands are constantly built and eroded by the salt water and are also flooded. Inhabited by economically marginalized population, flood risk assessment and NbS could be boon for them. Dykes, sand bars were discussed as flood risk management but NbS is so much better.
I am interested in NbS and attend webinars from TNC and thats how I came to know about this.
I am a freelancer and volunteer for a few nature based organizations and I think learning to use Waterproof would be a great skill to have for me.
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Monserrate Vlez -
Hello. My name is Monserrate Vélez. I work at Fondagua, which is a Water Fund in Ecuador. I am the Technical Chief. We work in the Daule river basin, on the Ecuadorian coast. This is the basin that provides water to Guayaquil, the largest city in my country.
I live in the lower basin, and because of ENSO forecast, I am deeply concerned about flooding.
In my opinion, the main challenge in implementing nature-based solutions is communicating the benefits to decision-makers and securing funding. In my city and in this basin, we need to implement a local policy that enables fundraising to support the adoption and implementation of these kinds of solutions.
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Paula Bernal -
Hello, my name is Paula, and I am an Environmental Engineering student in Bogotá, Colombia. A classmate recommended this course to me, and I saw it as an opportunity to expand my knowledge of flood risk management and learn more about environmental sustainability and community resilience.

In my opinion, early investment decisions should be supported by reliable data on rainfall patterns, historical flood events, land use, drainage systems, and climate projections. It is also essential to identify both the hazards and the vulnerability of exposed communities and infrastructure, since flood risk depends not only on the physical event but also on the social, environmental, and economic conditions that make an area more susceptible to its impacts. The use of appropriate modelling tools, risk maps, and hydrological simulations can help compare different scenarios, identify priority areas, and evaluate the potential effectiveness of proposed interventions before investing resources.

Nature-based Solutions, such as wetland restoration, riverbank protection, urban green spaces, and sustainable drainage systems, can help reduce flood risks while providing additional benefits for biodiversity and water management. However, their implementation faces several challenges, like limited funding, insufficient institutional support, lack of local knowledge, and poor coordination. Additionally, unplanned urbanization, deforestation, and inadequate drainage systems can increase flood risks and worsen their impacts.

In Colombia, these challenges are particularly relevant due to our diverse geography, Caribbean and Pacific coastlines, seasonal heavy rainfall, and vulnerability to climate change. I believe governments should strengthen environmental planning, improve access to data and technical resources, and promote community participation. Integrating Nature-based solutions into land-use planning and disaster risk management policies could help reduce flood risks while providing long-term environmental and social benefits.
In reply to Paula Bernal

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by sitaram sharnangat -
I am Sitaram Sharnangat and works in India.
I think only technical evidence alone is not enough in India.
Early investment decisions must integrate community‑validated knowledge, because communities know micro‑flood pathways better. They understand local land‑use changes like encroachment, sand mining, bund breaches and they can identify priority assets like schools, anganwadis, bridges, farmland etc. They determine social acceptance of NbS through village level Panchayat Raj system and social institutions like Gramsabha, Gram panchayat and Self Help groups and water user associations.
According to me the community‑based inputs like Participatory flood mapping (village‑level hazard sketches),
Historical flood timelines/ history (local narratives of past events), Livelihood impact assessments,
Community‑identified NbS options (e.g., bamboo buffers, check dams, wetland revival) and Local governance inputs (Gram Panchayat, Water committees, JFM committees) will play an important role in participatory decision making where technical data set and information will be accompanied by community based information.
I believe that technical information should be always accompanied by community acceptance so that required land for NBS, and necessary cooperation can be given by local communities.
In reply to Admin User

Re: What types of information, evidence, or tools do you consider essential to support decision‑making in early investment stages?

by Lorenna Vzquez -
Hi everyone, my name is Lorenna Vazquez. I have a Masters in Geology with emphasis in Environmental Remote Sensing but worked for 10 years with the USGS Water division in Puerto Rico, so my main expertise is in water. I'm now a Scientific Professional Services Consultant so it became a must to be on top of the new technologies and techniques that are available. As such, I recently completed another NbS certification, and they recommended we take this course so I'm excited to be here. In terms of main challenges to implement NbS for flood risk, I agree with other colleagues here mentioning that communication with decision makers is key. Scientists need to clearly convey the pressuring need for them to prioritize flood risk mitigation in a way that aligns with short and long-term benefits that can justify the cost for stakeholders. For this, a thorough assessment of the issues are needed and I believe a good recommendation is to work alongside environmental non-profits, which might help close any gap in governmental databases which are rarely well-maintained were I reside.